Back to Insights
Research

The Dramatic Decline of Computing Costs and What It Means for AI Pricing

From mainframes to AI: How 96% price drops in computing reveal the future of artificial intelligence economics

Derek Gilbert

Derek Gilbert

4 min read

The history of computing contains one of the most spectacular cost collapses in human economic history. Personal computer prices fell 96% between 1997 and 2015. AI infrastructure costs are declining at roughly 10x annually—far exceeding anything we saw with traditional computing. If this trajectory holds, artificial intelligence transforms from expensive luxury to essential utility faster than any previous technology wave.

To appreciate where we're headed, consider where we've been. The IBM 5100 Portable Computer cost nearly $9,000 in 1975—equivalent to over $45,000 today. The average desktop computer import price in 2023 was $474. Between 1998 and 2003, the Consumer Price Index for personal computers plummeted 84% in just five years. Quality-adjusted prices for IT equipment declined an average of 16% annually from 1959 to 2009, accelerating to 23% per year during the late 1990s dotcom boom.

Memory costs collapsed from hundreds of dollars per kilobyte in the 1960s to well below a dollar per gigabyte today—a reduction spanning ten orders of magnitude. Storage followed a similar trajectory. 256GB of capacity that would have cost $20 billion in the 1950s now runs under $50. These aren't gradual declines. They're technological revolutions expressed in price.

The 2020-2025 period brought unprecedented volatility. COVID-19 drove PC sales up 13% to 302 million units, the highest since 2014, as remote work created sudden demand spikes. This surge collided with a global chip shortage affecting over 169 industries. Enterprise hardware consistently commanded $100-200 premiums over consumer models for equivalent specifications. Market consolidation accelerated, with Lenovo, HP, and Dell now controlling roughly two-thirds of the global PC market.

AI infrastructure operates at an entirely different scale. NVIDIA's H100 GPUs start at $25,000 per unit, with complete DGX systems exceeding $400,000. The newest B200 GPUs run $30,000-40,000 individually, while GB200 NVL72 server systems can reach $3 million. These prices reflect extreme engineering required for AI workloads consuming up to 700 watts per GPU.

Cloud providers offer more accessible entry points but still at premium prices. AWS charges nearly $100 per hour for 8-GPU H100 instances, while specialized providers like DataCrunch offer the same hardware for under $4 per hour—highlighting significant market fragmentation. The scale of investment is staggering. Microsoft alone committed $46 billion to AI data centers in 2024. Global data center investment for AI is projected to reach $6.7 trillion by 2030.

The economics are challenging for AI companies. OpenAI is projected to spend $7 billion on training and inference in 2024 while generating only $3.5-4.5 billion in revenue, resulting in roughly $5 billion in annual losses. Anthropic achieves only 50-55% gross margins compared to 77% average for traditional SaaS. Unlike traditional software with near-zero marginal costs, every AI query consumes real compute resources.

But here's where history becomes instructive. AI inference costs are declining by 10x annually, far exceeding historical technology cost reduction patterns. GPT-3 pricing fell from $60 per million tokens in November 2021 to $0.06 in 2024—a 1,000x reduction in just three years. Hardware improvements deliver 48% annual cost reductions for AI computation. Model efficiency gains are equally dramatic—Meta's Llama 3 8B matches the performance of Llama 2 70B with 10x fewer parameters.

Multiple factors compound these declines. Competition intensifies as open-source models match proprietary performance. Switching between providers requires only single-line code changes. The shift from 16-bit to 8-bit processing alone provides 2x efficiency gains. On-device processing, exemplified by Apple's models running locally, eliminates cloud costs entirely for many applications.

Current AI adoption stands at just 5-8% of U.S. businesses, but falling costs are poised to trigger explosive growth. Financial services lead with 30% adoption rates, while construction and retail lag at 4%. What once required $100,000 in development costs is now achievable for, as one industry expert put it, "literally 10 cents." The global AI market is projected to grow from $184 billion in 2024 to $827 billion by 2030.

The implications for strategy are significant. Organizations should avoid over-optimizing for current AI costs given the 10x annual decline rate. Focus on building capabilities and use cases that will deliver value as costs approach zero. Paying $1,000 today for an AI task that will cost $1 in three years may still generate positive ROI if implemented immediately.

Prioritize flexibility over lock-in. With prices dropping rapidly and new models emerging constantly, the ability to switch providers quickly becomes crucial. Monitor both major cloud providers and specialized GPU cloud services—price disparities of 3-10x exist for identical hardware. Strategic planning should assume AI becomes a utility like electricity by 2030.

Businesses that integrate AI deeply into operations now will compound advantages as costs fall. But maintain realistic expectations. While inference costs plummet, the need for customization, integration, and human oversight ensures AI won't be truly "free." Plan for a future where AI costs shift from consumption-based to value-based pricing models, similar to how software evolved from per-seat licenses to enterprise agreements.

The trajectory is clear. The only question is how quickly organizations will position themselves to capture the value.

Derek Gilbert

Derek Gilbert

Exploring AI strategy, implementation, and building capability that lasts.

More Articles